A controversial motion seeking to control the country’s population has caused a major uproar in the House of Representatives.
While some members did not see anything wrong with the motion, Muslims and a section of northern members said it was a direct attack on Islam.
The controversial motion moved by Hon Babatunde Gabriel Kolawole was titled “Need for the Federal Government to curb population explosion in Nigeria.”
Kolawole, while moving the motion, asked the House to urge the Federal Government to curb the current population explosion by coming up with a workable reduction policy and directing the National Orientation Agency, NOA, to educate Nigerians on the benefits of family planning.
The lawmaker warned that Nigeria, as a potential third most populous country in the world by 2050, is heading in such direction if it does not immediately commence the implementation of an action plan to curb unbridled population growth.
Kolawole had hardly concluded his submission, however, when a member, Sani Abdul, from Bauchi State set the tone for other Northern lawmakers to object to the motion when he said the motion was unnecessary and a waste of time.
But, the Speaker, Yakubu Dogara, disagreed with Abdul, noting that the motion was necessary since it was a planning issue.
Abdul in sustaining his argument, however, insisted that population is the strength of any nation, adding that Nigeria has the resources and land mass to accommodate any population explosion.
Thereafter, lawmakers, mostly from the north and Muslims, who contributed to the motion, were unanimous in speaking against it.
They contended that it was anti-Islam and a direct attack on their religion.
Zakare Mohammed, who claimed that he was not against the motion; at the same said the country’s culture must be preserved.
According to him, in the north and in Islam, it is acceptable to have more than one wife and bear as many children as one so desires.
However, Adam Jagaba raised a constitutional point of order, saying that the motion was in line with the constitution and did not offend any part of the House rules.
Another member had raised a point of order pursuant to Order 9 Rule 8 of the House Rule, saying the motion was in no way attacking Muslims.
The lawmaker said this is not the intent of the motion, implying that Sani Abdul’s submission opposing the motion was impugning motives, which was against the House rule.
Speaker Dogara in sustaining his point of order said there was no attack by the motion on any religion.
“It is only a call for policy for planning. It is only when the policy is developed that you can attack it,” he said.
In his ruling, the Speaker referred the motion to the Committees on Justice, Population and Rules and Business to consider the way forward.
Got a news tip/information for us? Email email@example.com
Follow us on twitter @thesheetng
BBM Channel: C0042057A
Like us on Facebook @ www.facebook.com / The Sheet
This is a 2015 Copyright of thesheet.ng. You may wish to request express approval from thesheet.ng to republish