Embattled Abia State Governor, Dr Okezie Ikpeazu,has told the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja which removed him from office as governor that he cannot be removed from office as governor.
Speaking through his counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), the governor stressed that the Federal High Court lacked the power to order him to vacate the seat of Abia State Governor.
“The trial Judge erred in law when he ordered as a consequential order that the appellant vacates his office as the Governor of Abia State immediately, when there was no jurisdiction in the Federal High Court to remove, vacate the occupier of the office of the governor of a state or order the removal of such officer after the unsuccessful challenge of the result of the election at the Tribunal and swearing in of the appellant as the governor.”
The governor while speaking further added that the only power, authority and order exercisable by the Federal High Court was to disqualify the candidate from contesting the election based on section 31(6) of the Electoral Act 2010.
Ikepazu also faulted the Judge when he held that he did not pay his tax for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, as and when due, when he was a Public Officer, whose tax deduction was under Pay As You Earn (PAYE) scheme where tax deductions were from the source of his monthly salary by the tax authorities who issued all the tax receipts and certificates.
He further stated that the Abia State Board of Internal Revenue Services that issued him with the tax certificates had not declared the certificates forged and that the trial court did not invite the issuing authorities to give evidence in the course of the trial.
He also accused the trial Judge, Justice Okon Abang of violating his right to fair hearing by embarking on the judicial investigation without giving him (Ikepazu) the opportunity to address the court on the issue.
Ikepazu also rejected the decision of the high court declaring him unqualified to be nominated as the primary election conducted by his party because false information was supplied to INEC.
According to him, INEC Form CF001, which the Judge relied on, was not one of the grounds for qualification to contest the Primary election of PDP.
He stated that the Judge misconceived the presentations by the Parties and thereby arrived at a wrong conclusion which occasioned a grave miscarriage of justice.
SEE ALSO: SEE WHAT THE OBAMAS ARE DOING IN LIBERIA
Got a news tip/information for us? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Follow us on twitter @thesheetng
BBM Channel: C0042057A
Like us on Facebook @ www.facebook.com / The Sheet
This is a 2016 Copyright of thesheet.ng. You may wish to request express approval from thesheet.ng to republish